Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) has published ‘Solar Under Storm III’, and analyzes the impact of hurricane on solar farms in the Caribbean after Hurricane Beryl and identifying important failure modes and risk -limiting measures.
For obvious reasons, solar panels must survive in the elements. Whether the threat is hail” Norwegianor a rare Hurricane-Tornado In Florida there is solar energy in nature and to survive nature, installations must be hardened for resilience. In the strongest hurricane zones, that means resistance of winds of 180 miles per hour.
RMI has published “Solar under Storm III‘Build on being First editionTo analyze failure modes on Solar Farms after Hurricane Beryl – the earliest category 5 storm on record – that met Grenada, Saint Vincent and the grenadines in July 2024. The group investigated three projects in the grenadines: one built for best practices and two that were not.
At the highest level, the group identified nine recurring errors in several hurricanes and projects, together with six characteristics related to survival.
General errors:
- Top Down or T-Clamp failures of modules
- Sub -size racks, or racks that are not designed for wind load
- Lack of lateral racking support (inadequate design on the side))
- Subside bolts
- Sublet bolts
- Lack of vibration -resistant connections
- PV module design too low for the environment
- PV module Frame Low Cycle Fatigue Failure
- Use of self -tapping screws instead of going through
Surviving characteristics:
- Dual-Post Piers
- Baking solar modules (no top-down or T-clamps)
- Lateral racking supports
- Structural calculations on record
- Owner -Engineer of Record with QA/QC program
- Vibration -resistant fixed connections, such as Nyloc Moeren
RMI outlines ten specifications to tackle exposure to wind and the environment (SALT), including 4000 PA Uplift-assessed solar modules, robust engineering, design with fixed tilt (no trackers) and 25-year-old corrosion resistance. These measures are intended to prevent the aforementioned nine most common errors that have been identified in Solar projects damaged by Hurricane.
The report categorizes observed damage using an error modes and effect analysis (FMEA), grouping problems in six areas, including module frame and laminate, balance of system equipment such as inverters and four racking-related categories: module rack connections, structural rack-components, structural rack-components.
The most common failure point is the module-to-rack connection. There are several ways to fail this connection, with both the Solar Module frame and the racking hardware that plays critical roles. Over time, repeated storm exposure and salt -loaded air can weaken the frame itself, making it more susceptible to failure, even if the racking hardware remains intact.
Module-to-rack connections are especially critical because it even increases the failure of a single connection the surface of adjacent modules that are exposed to wind, which can quickly activate a step-by-step failure over the series.
The appendix to the report notes that on the Carriacou site only 35% of the modules were undamaged. RMI attributes more than 50% of the damage to malfunctions of shared top-down clips between multiple modules. Another 30% was linked to the use of a dual-tilt East-West system, allowing wind to get under modules on the other.
The facility of Union Island did a little better, with only 40% of the panels undamaged. Here the top-down clip disturbances accounted for around 30% of the damage, while vibrations and suborders have contributed to the rest.
The facility of Mayreau Island saw almost 70% of its damaged modules, mainly because of the failure of thinner, shorter aluminum frames, a type that is common in many markets, but not viable for long -term use in the Caribbean. This was the first time that RMI had observed this specific failure mode with such new solar modules. The team was able to insulate it thanks to generally strong building practices elsewhere on the site.
The rest of the Mayreau project performed well, with a paved module mounting with vibration-resistant hardware, a low-tilt dual-post Foundation design and a well-executed electric balance of the system.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to work with us and reuse part of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
Popular content
