India is expected to add 30 GW to new energy storage capacity by June 2027 via independent and fixed Renewable Energy (FDRE) projects, according to a recent report from SBI Capital Markets (SBICAPs). This may possibly push the total capacity up to 36 GW against 24 GW of estimated demand.
“Currently, the available storage capacity is heavily under the required account of the assigned energy storage obligation (ESO). In the coming two years, 30 GW storage is expected (Standalone, FDRE, etc.)
It said that the surplus capacity will remain dependent on energy arbitrage in times of peak mismatch on the exchange. IR said that the total prices on exchange will gradually fall due to a combination of market coupling, electricity divide and increasing storage, which will bring players of higher costs out of grace.
Sbicaps said that India could take over China’s income stack model by combining income from capacity, associated services and energy arbitration for superior project trends. Currently, the income of Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) are dominated by capacity payments made by buying entities (usually discoms) with/without intermediary at competitive offers.
“The next phase of Bess project development in India would include the diversification of sources of income that go beyond capacity costs by market -based additional services income for generating income with active participation of bodies other than SLDC/NLDC,” Sbicaps said.
Dentures in the Indian renewable energy sector remain focused on battery storage, whereby the first half of the calendar year 2025 maintains an increased level of independent Bess and FDRE Awards. Battery costs decreases have made an increasing share of the higher cycle, longer discharge projects at slim rates.
“Falling Li-ion costs now support more tenders of 4 hours, with associated rates that compete with those of 2-hour projects-ending with the typical evening peak duration,” Sbicaps said. “With an important pipeline of today built in construction projects, the focus has shifted to implementation.”
The report identifies land acquisition and obtaining transmission link (via a sequentially two -stage process) as the most important bottlenecks, which have stretched time lines for completing the project from six to nine months to 18 to 24 months. Timely financial closure, VGF payments for viability GAP financing (VGF) and BEPSA version also stimulate results.
In the operational phase, risks with regard to technology performance and payment of the counterparties in the game. Faster than expected battery performance degradation and the lifetime of the lower cycle, project trends can influence.
The report states that developers with proven implementation capacity, a strong counterpartijmix and low bod announcements are best positioned to guarantee financing and to appear as sector leaders.
The report states that power -generating integration in India is currently in the early stages and Global Supply Dynamic offers a limited scope for domestication. Only a few makers of battery cells have reported the efficiency worldwide on equity (roe) above 10%. The situation is also not much better for precursors such as cathodes and anodes. Although LFP remains relatively less pressure than NMC, the use of use with high enforcement capacity remains moderate.
Control of Celchemie is also technologically intensive, with only a few companies such as Catl and BYD able to generate returns in a market that is plagued with low capacity use Factor (CUF) in the ecosystem.
The report recommends the strategy for ‘import to’ use for the short term, with a view to catching the next Golf Battery Technologies in the early stages.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to work with us and reuse part of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
Popular content
