Close Menu
  • News
  • Industry
  • Solar Panels
  • Commercial
  • Residential
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Carbon Credit
  • More
    • Policy
    • Energy Storage
    • Utility
    • Cummunity
What's Hot

Mitsubishi Electric Trane announces new heat pump line for hydronic heating – SPE

March 6, 2026

Origis is developing a 413 MW solar portfolio in West Texas

March 6, 2026

New Jersey expands state community solar program by 3 GW

March 6, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Solar Energy News
Friday, March 6
  • News
  • Industry
  • Solar Panels
  • Commercial
  • Residential
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Carbon Credit
  • More
    • Policy
    • Energy Storage
    • Utility
    • Cummunity
Solar Energy News
Home - Energy Storage - Direct versus indirect coupling in PV-powered hydrogen generation – SPE
Energy Storage

Direct versus indirect coupling in PV-powered hydrogen generation – SPE

solarenergyBy solarenergyAugust 21, 2024No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Researchers in Spain have conducted a comparative analysis of annual solar hydrogen production for direct and indirect configurations and found that indirect systems not only produce more hydrogen, but also exhibit greater resilience to module power losses.

August 21, 2024 Lior Kahana

Scientists from Spain’s Technical University of Madrid have conducted a comparative study of direct and indirect coupling configurations for PV and electrolyzers in green hydrogen (H2) production. The research was based on numerical simulations carried out with the software MATLAB, with weather conditions based on a typical meteorological year in Madrid.

PV powered hydrogen systems where the input of the electrolyzer is connected to the electrical output of the PV generator without an intermediate power stage are often referred to as a direct coupling configuration. Indirect configuration systems, on the other hand, contain electronics to control the PV generator at its maximum power and use Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT), which maximizes PV energy generation as weather conditions vary, with a DC-DC converter that matches the output power supplied by the MPPT to the input power of the electrolyzer.

“The indirect configuration includes a power stage (PS) with a maximum power point tracker and a DC-DC converter, which maintains optimal power transfer from PV to electrolyzers, but incurs losses at the PS. The direct configuration avoids these losses, but requires a specific design of the PV generator to achieve high electrical transfer,” the scientists said, pointing to the main advantages and disadvantages of each configuration.

“In defense of direct coupling, several authors argue that this configuration could be sufficiently good to allow the electrolyzer to operate near the MPP if the PV array and electrolyzer are properly designed; Others state that direct coupling configuration is economically advantageous because the costs of electronic coupling systems are completely avoided.”

See also  How large-scale schedule infrastructure projects to deliver-PV Magazine International

The research group performed a series of simulations on an experimental setup consisting of a 100 W solar panel and a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer with a maximum current density of 4 A-cm2. In the case of the indirect system, the efficiency of the DC-DC converter is assumed to be 95%, while in the case of the direct system, the number of solar cells connected in series and the cell area are optimized while maintaining the power of the PV . module for a fair comparison.

“The presence of the MPPT ensures that the PV module operates on its MPPT under all meteorological conditions, unlike the direct coupling configuration, which only operates near MPPT for a sparse range of global irradiance and temperature., even if the number of cells is optimized,” the group explains.

“This higher PV power also translates into a greater amount of electrical energy transferred to the electrolyzer and therefore greater H2 production.”

Through this analysis, the scientists discovered that thanks to the PS, the indirect coupling configuration can inject 223 kWh per year of electrical energy, which is 39.4% more than the direct configuration, into the electrolyzer. This would be enough to produce 5.79 kg of H2 per year, which would be 37.5% more than the amount produced with the direct coupling system.

The direct system was also found to achieve an energy efficiency of 5%, while the indirect system showed an efficiency of 6.9%.

In addition, the scientists also assessed which system is more resistant to power losses of modules. If it were to lose one of the twenty cells in the PV module, the direct system would lose 18.3% of its H2 production, while the indirect system would only lose 5%. With a loss of seven cells, the direct system will stop producing H2, while the indirect system will still produce it, albeit at a 37% lower capacity.

See also  India's renewable storage capacity to increase by 6 GW by FY 2028 – SPE

Furthermore, the academics found that only when the efficiency of the DC-DC converter drops below 73% will it produce less H2 than the directly coupled system. “For a DC-DC converter design to be considered valid, its efficiency must be higher than 90%, so a scenario with efficiency and H2 production as low as with the direct coupling is unlikely to occur,” the researchers stressed. researchers.

Their findings can be found in the study “Optimization of hydrogen production: a comparative study of direct and indirect coupling between photovoltaic solar energy and electrolyzer”, published in Energy conversion and management.

This content is copyrighted and may not be reused. If you would like to collaborate with us and reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.

Popular content

Source link

coupling direct generation hydrogen indirect PVpowered SPE
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
solarenergy
  • Website

Related Posts

Mitsubishi Electric Trane announces new heat pump line for hydronic heating – SPE

March 6, 2026

Oleic acid anti-pollution coating for solar panels – SPE

March 5, 2026

EirGrid identifies a shortage of energy capacity in Ireland

March 5, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Don't Miss
Energy Storage

PVT-assisted Air Source Heat pump based on phase change tank-PV Magazine International

By solarenergyFebruary 19, 20250

Scientists in China have designed a photovoltaic thermal integrated air source heat pump hot water…

Teledyne Flir presents new PV inspection products

April 22, 2025

Reducing the risk of extreme weather damage for solar trackers

April 28, 2024

Carbon Offset/Carbon Credit Market Likely to Drive Future Growth by 2028 According to New Analysis from Leading Research Firm

July 9, 2024
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Our Picks

Mitsubishi Electric Trane announces new heat pump line for hydronic heating – SPE

March 6, 2026

Origis is developing a 413 MW solar portfolio in West Texas

March 6, 2026

New Jersey expands state community solar program by 3 GW

March 6, 2026

How to address imbalance datasets in solar panel dust detection

March 5, 2026
Our Picks

Mitsubishi Electric Trane announces new heat pump line for hydronic heating – SPE

March 6, 2026

Origis is developing a 413 MW solar portfolio in West Texas

March 6, 2026

New Jersey expands state community solar program by 3 GW

March 6, 2026
About
About

Stay updated with the latest in solar energy. Discover innovations, trends, policies, and market insights driving the future of sustainable power worldwide.

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news and updates about Solar industry directly in your inbox!

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 Tsolarenergynews.co - All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.