Close Menu
  • News
  • Industry
  • Solar Panels
  • Commercial
  • Residential
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Carbon Credit
  • More
    • Policy
    • Energy Storage
    • Utility
    • Cummunity
What's Hot

The UK government has urged to ensure that plug-in solar is properly regulated

July 22, 2026

Cornwall Insight cuts price ceiling forecast after Burnham’s VAT cut

July 22, 2026

SmartestEnergy, Greentech ink CfD PPA for the Kent solar project

July 22, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Solar Energy News
Thursday, July 23
  • News
  • Industry
  • Solar Panels
  • Commercial
  • Residential
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Carbon Credit
  • More
    • Policy
    • Energy Storage
    • Utility
    • Cummunity
Solar Energy News
Home - Solar Industry - Scientists identify a new loss factor in tracker-based PV installations on gently undulating terrain
Solar Industry

Scientists identify a new loss factor in tracker-based PV installations on gently undulating terrain

solarenergyBy solarenergyApril 16, 2026No Comments5 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Researchers in Spain have identified a new source of underperformance in utility-scale PV installations, caused by “suboptimal backtracking” on slightly uneven terrain. The study shows that real tracker control systems deviate from ideal flat terrain assumptions, reducing radiation capture and causing measurable energy losses compared to simulations.

April 16, 2026
Emiliano Bellini

Researchers from the Polytechnic University of Madrid claim to have identified a new source of underperformance in ground-mounted PV installations using solar trackers.

“We started this work after receiving several questions at IES-UPM wondering why the radiation gain of trackers in utility-scale PV installations was lower than estimated during the design phase,” said the corresponding author. Juan Santamaría Sancho told it pv magazine. “To address this issue, we analyzed real operational data from more than 7,000 trackers in seven utility-scale PV installations. The results show that tracker angles are ignored to avoid shadow effects caused by slightly undulating terrain, leading to a lower than expected increase in tracking irradiance because actual operating angles are more tilted than those assumed in standard simulations.”

“This behavior reveals a new category of energy losses, defined as suboptimal backtracking losses, which explain part of the gap between simulated and actual energy yields. We quantify these losses using our PV simulation tool SISIFO, finding differences of up to 2% in tracking-related radiation gains between standard modeled expectations and actual operation,” he continued.

Backtracking in PV installations is a control strategy used in solar tracking systems to reduce shading between adjacent rows of panels. Instead of always pointing directly at the sun, trackers tilt back slightly when the sun is low to prevent one row from casting shadows on the other. This helps maximize overall energy yield throughout the plant, especially in dense layouts or in the early morning and late afternoon.

See also  Adapture activates a 67 MW solar project in Texas ahead of schedule

The scientists explained that under assumptions of flat terrain, shadow is precisely avoided and the energy yield matches the simulation results, while real PV installations often exhibit small height differences between tracker rows due to uneven terrain. These deviations break the coplanarity assumption and introduce unexpected shadows during retracing when ideal angles are used.

Photos taken at a real utility-scale PV plant installed on sloping terrain during backtracking periods.

Image: Polytechnic University of Madrid, Renewable Energy, CC BY 4.0

To prevent this, tracker controllers apply an overcorrection, where the tilt is slightly reduced to eliminate shadows between the rows. This overcorrection leads to visible ground illumination patterns, indicating lost radiation that is not captured by the solar panels. Such effects are particularly evident during backtracking periods, in both morning and afternoon transitions, with field observations confirming that this phenomenon is absent during the afternoon, when trackers track the sun directly.

“Standard performance indicators such as the performance ratio do not capture these losses because they rely on assumptions about in-plane irradiance,” the scientists explained. “As a result, the discrepancy between the simulated and actual energy yield becomes difficult to detect with conventional measurement data.”

The researchers compared experimentally measured tracker rotation angles from SCADA systems of the PV installations with theoretical values ​​calculated for perfectly flat terrain under ideal backtracking conditions. All installations analyzed used single-axis tracking systems installed in nominally horizontal locations.

Operational data showed deviations from simulated behavior. These deviations were determined by imperfection correction strategies embedded in tracker control algorithms and inherent tracking delays or misalignments. In addition, time series data for representative trackers were analyzed and compared with several modeled backtracking correction approaches, identifying the best-fitting correction model for each PV installation by minimizing deviations between measured and simulated angles.

See also  Fracsun unveils a new AI-powered tool for modeling solar pollution loss

“The results showed that even plants on flat terrain show systematic angular changes during return, confirming the presence of hidden correction strategies in real controllers,” said Santamaría Sancho. “Additional simulations using SISIFO indicate that including measured or corrected angles significantly improves the agreement with real energy production compared to idealized assumptions.”

The analysis also showed that annual losses due to tracking-related effects can exceed 5% compared to ideal simulations without operational constraints. Overall, the results showed that the behavior of the real tracker systematically deviates from the ideal backtracking models due to practical control adjustments. These deviations have a measurable impact on radiation capture and help explain some of the gap between simulated and actual PV performance.

“An examination of tracker rotation angle data from systems supplied by different manufacturers and operating under different configurations in seven real PV installations, spread over five geographical regions with a total capacity of approximately 1 GW, showed that the problem arises from simulations that typically assume perfectly flat terrain, while actual locations exhibit varying levels of ground irregularities,” the researcher said.

“Importantly, these losses are particularly valuable from an economic perspective because they occur during periods without restrictions and when energy prices tend to be higher,” the scientists concluded. “This makes even apparently small deviations of 1% to 3% in the captured radiation significant in terms of turnover”

Their findings are available in the study “Modeling energy losses due to overridden backtracking in utility-scale photovoltaic installations on gently undulating terrain: implementation in the SISIFO pre-performance assessment tool”, published in Renewable energy.

This content is copyrighted and may not be reused. If you would like to collaborate with us and reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.

See also  The impact of microclimate effects on floating PV installations – SPE

Popular content

Source link

factor gently identify installations loss scientists Terrain trackerbased undulating
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
solarenergy
  • Website

Related Posts

Nominations open for Solar Builder’s Project of the Year Awards 2026

July 21, 2026

Janta Power supplies solar energy to FIFA World Cup Fan Festivals in Texas

July 21, 2026

Foothill Medical Center Association gets solar roof upgrade | Projects Weekly

July 20, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Don't Miss
Solar Industry

AWM adds a custom Bonsai Module cable hanger for Array technologies

By solarenergyApril 4, 20250

By Brad Kramer April 2, 2025 Affordable Wire Management (AWM) has developed various new Bonsai…

Italian EAEA tests of very UV transparent Encapsulantia

February 27, 2025

Will we finally buy European PV modules?

April 17, 2026

Nanostructured anti-reflective coating for gallium arsenide solar cells – SPE

November 17, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Our Picks

The UK government has urged to ensure that plug-in solar is properly regulated

July 22, 2026

Cornwall Insight cuts price ceiling forecast after Burnham’s VAT cut

July 22, 2026

SmartestEnergy, Greentech ink CfD PPA for the Kent solar project

July 22, 2026

Flexibility as an asset

July 22, 2026
Our Picks

The UK government has urged to ensure that plug-in solar is properly regulated

July 22, 2026

Cornwall Insight cuts price ceiling forecast after Burnham’s VAT cut

July 22, 2026

SmartestEnergy, Greentech ink CfD PPA for the Kent solar project

July 22, 2026
About
About

Stay updated with the latest in solar energy. Discover innovations, trends, policies, and market insights driving the future of sustainable power worldwide.

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news and updates about Solar industry directly in your inbox!

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 Tsolarenergynews.co - All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.